Raw milk should not be consumed by anyone for any reason,” said John Sheehan, head of the FDA’s dairy office. “It is an inherently dangerous product.”msnbc
Who should avoid raw milk? Everyone should avoid raw milk and products made with raw milk.CDC (PDF)
Pretty scary, huh? Let’s take a look at some numbers and see just how scary…
From 1993 to 2006, 69 outbreaks of human infections resulting from consumption of raw milk were reported to CDC. These outbreaks included a total of 1,505 reported illnesses, 185 hospitalizations and 2 deaths.CDC
1993-2006 is 14 years (inclusively), so let’s divide 1,505 by 14 and 2 by 14…and we get:
- 108 illnesses/year from raw milk
- .14 deaths/year from raw milk
Hmm…that doesn’t sound too high statistically speaking. How does that compare to foodborne illnesses/deaths in general?
We estimate that foodborne diseases cause approximately 76 million illnesses, 325,000 hospitalizations, and 5,000 deaths in the United States each year.CDC
Wait, wait, wait…“foodborne diseases cause approximately 76 million illnesses…and 5,000 deaths” and raw milk causes 108 illnesses and .14 deaths each year, yet the FDA singles out raw milk “an inherently dangerous product”? It sounds like food in general is a far greater danger to the American public.
But what about pasteurized milk? It’s completely safe, right?
Well…No.
A review of the cases DHS [California Department of Health Services] cited in their Report, p. 4, shows 156 individual cases attributed to raw milk from 1973 until 1992, but no outbreaks or epidemics attributed to raw milk. If that figure were valid…there were only 5.6 cases yearly (156 cases 19 years = 5.6 cases) attributed to raw milk. That is the lowest case incidence of any animal product produced. However, there is extensive evidence showing that pasteurization is a great health risk to the public. Pasteurized diary caused numerous epidemics. In the years 1978-1997, 232,485 people suffered due to outbreaks from pasteurized milk. (SR p. 8-10.) If we were to disregard all of the other outbreaks from pasteurized milk and consider only those listed on pages 5-8, we have: 232,485 cases ÷ 19 years = 12,236 people affected each year by pasteurized milk products. In almost all cases, CDC reported that investigation showed proper pasteurization.Report in Favor of Raw Milk (PDF)
I couldn’t find national figures for pasteurized milk, but the CDC covers numerous outbreaks. Here are just a few:
Between June 11 and July 29, 1982, a large interstate outbreak of enteritis caused by Yersinia enterocolitica occurred. Epidemiologic investigation implicated milk pasteurized at a plant in Memphis, Tennessee, as the vehicle of infection. One hundred seventy-two culture-positive Y. enterocolitica infections were identified…. Most patients required hospitalization, and 17 underwent appendectomies.
Between March 22, and April 8, 1985, over 1,500 culture-confirmed cases of salmonellosis in northern Illinois have been reported to the Illinois Department of Public Health. Investigations have linked the outbreak to 2% pasteurized milk (”Blue Brook” brand) from one processing plant.
Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes Infections Associated with Pasteurized Milk from a Local Dairy — Massachusetts, 2007…. In all, five cases were identified, and three deaths occurred. CDC
Hmm…it seems pasteurization is not a panacea.
So maybe raw milk isn’t as “dangerous” as it’s made out to be, but why would you want to go out of your way to drink raw milk?
There are lots of reasons!
| COMPARISON CHART BETWEEN RAW AND PASTEURIZED MILKS | ||
| Category Compared | Raw Milk | Pasteurized Milk |
| 1) Enzymes: | All available. | Less than 10% remaining. |
| 2) Protein: | 100% available, all 22 amino acids, including 8 that are essential. | Protein-lysine and tyrosine are altered by heat with serious loss of metabolic availability. This results in making the whole protein complex less available for tissue repair and rebuilding. |
| 3) Fats: (research studies indicate that fats are necessary to metabolize protein and calcium. All natural protein-bearing foods contain fats.) | All 18 fatty acids metabolically available, both saturated and unsaturated fats. | Altered by heat, especially the 10 essential unsaturated fats. |
| 4) Vitamins: | All 100% available. | Among the fat-soluble vitamins, some are classed as unstable and therefore a loss is caused by heating above blood temperature. This loss of Vitamin A, D, E and F can run as high as 66%. Vitamin C loss usually exceeds 50%. Losses on watersoluble vitamins are affected by heat and can run from 38% to 80%. |
| 5) Carbohydrates: | Easily utilized in metabolism. Still associated naturally with elements. | Tests indicate that heat has made some changes making elements less available metabolically. |
| 6) Minerals/elements: | All 100% metabolically available. Major mineral/elemental components are calcium, chlorine, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium and sulphur. Vital trace minerals, all 24 or more, 100% available. | Calcium is altered by heat and loss in metabolism may run 50% or more, depending on pasteurization temperature. Losses in other essential minerals, because one mineral usually acts synergistically with another element. There is a loss of enzymes that serve as leaders in assimilation minerals. (Ex: phosphatase is essential for the absorption of calcium and is plentifully present in raw milk but completely destroyed by pasteurization.) |
Src: Report in Favor of Raw Milk (PDF)
Plus, it just tastes great! It’s rich, creamy, and delicious. If you live in a state that allows the sale of raw milk, I urge you to give it a try. And if your state doesn’t allow it, I urge you to support your local Alliance for Raw Milk organization and advocate for change.

